Legal Opinion

Dixon v. . Osborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1931PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The only assignment of error which can be considered on this appeal is that based upon the exception to the judgment in this action at May Term, 1931. There are no exceptions stated in the case on appeal, appearing in the record, to support the other assignments of error relied upon by tbe plaintiffs.' These assignments of error, therefore, cannot be considered on this appeal. Only exceptions taken at the trial or assigned in the case on appeal will be considered by this Court. Howell v. R. R., 186 N. C., 239, 119 S. E., 198; Rawls v. R. R., 112 N. C., 211, 90 S. E., 116; Worley v. Logging…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mebane v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Wallace v. . SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API