Legal Opinion · Concurrence
McCormick v. . Proctor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 2, 1940PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.
BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., join in concurring opinion. The plaintiff in this action seeks to restrain the defendants, sheriff of Pitt County, N.C. and the chief of police of the city of Greenville, N.C. from interfering with certain slot machines in his possession, contending that taxes have been paid on the machines and they are legal slot machines. The prayer for relief is as follows: "(1) That the defendants, sheriff of Pitt County and chief of police of the city of Greenville, their officers, deputies, agents, employees and attorneys, be restrained and enjoined from in any wise…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Daniels v. HomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- SS Kresge Company v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.