Legal Opinion
TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1957No. 29,476PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, C. J.
This is an appeal from a permanent injunction issued against the appellants, restraining them from interfering with the installation or operation of appellee’s pinball machines in the city of Indianapolis.
Appellee maintained its action upon the theory that pinball machines of the type owned by appellee, which granted only an immediate right of replay, are expressly excluded from the application of the so-called Hasbrook Law, Chapter 265 of the Acts of the Indiana General Assembly, 1955 (being §§10-2329 — 2336, Burns’ 1956 Kepi.), which act is concerned with the crime of gambling and provides…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Albert v. Milk Control Board of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Podgor v. Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sullivan v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. FurmageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.