State v. Gregory
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The exception to the judge’s charge needs little discussion. Although the jury might have exercised the privilege given it under pertinent statutes discussed elsewhere, >and convicted the defendant of an assault of less grade than that charged, and even of simple assault, the court is not required to encourage such inconsistency where there is no evidence of such minor offense. S. v. Elmore, 212 N. C., 531, 532, 193 S. E., 713; S. v. Lee, 192 N. C., 225, 134 S. E., 458; S. v. Smith, *418201 N. C., 494, 160 S. E., 577; S. v. Ratcliff, 199 N. C., 9, 153 S. E., 605; S. v. White, 138 N. C., 704,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- State v. . HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.