Legal Opinion
State v. Kuhlman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 2006No. A06-568PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In August 2005, a Minneapolis traffic camera recorded a vehicle failing to stop at a red light. Daniel Kuhlman, the respondent, owned the vehicle and was issued a citation under the city’s photo-enforcement ordinance. The district court granted Kuhlman’s motion to dismiss and the city appeals. The city also moves to strike information in the appendix of the amicus brief. We deny the motion to strike and affirm the district court’s decision.
FACTS
In September 2004, the Minneapolis City Council enacted sections 474.620 to 474.670 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Jennissen v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Jennissen v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Minn. Chamber Commerce v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.