Legal Opinion
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 2018No. A17-0221PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
This case requires us to decide whether state law preempts a proposal to amend the charter of the City of Bloomington (the *458City) to require voter approval before the City can implement organized collection of solid waste. Appellants, a group of Bloomington residents, proposed the charter amendment. The city declined to place the proposed amendment on a ballot on the ground that Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 (2016), which specifies processes that municipalities must follow before implementing organized collection, preempted the "field" of regulation of the process by which a city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Bicking v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graco, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Fletcher Properties, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Graco, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Minn. Chamber Commerce v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019