Legal Opinion
State v. Kuhlman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 2007No. A06-568PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
In September 2004, the Minneapolis City Council enacted Minneapolis Code of Ordinances sections 474.620 to 474.670, which authorized photo enforcement of traffic control signals. The Minneapolis police began enforcing the new ordinance in July 2005, and on August 11, 2005, one of the cameras photographed a car as it failed to stop at a red light at the intersection of West Broadway Avenue and Lyn- dale Avenue North. The Minneapolis Police Department mailed a citation to the registered owner of the car, respondent Daniel Alan Kuhlman, for violating the ordinance. Kuhlman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Peterson v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Duffy v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Idris v. City of Chicago, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- City of Sioux City v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.