Legal Opinion
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 1, 1966No. 39824PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court declaring Ordinance No. 11.10 of the village of Richfield to be a valid and enforceable ordinance.
Plaintiffs in this case, Mangold Midwest Company, United Distributors of Minnesota, Inc., and A. M. Servicing Corporation of Raytown, operate a large retail department store at 7701 Nicollet Avenue South in the village of Richfield. The store has been operating in that location since 1959. From the time of its opening until May 1962, the plaintiffs experienced no difficulty in keeping their store open on Sundays as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Thelsen v. McDavidSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- James R. Anderson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Douglas County Dennis Nagle, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.