Legal Opinion

Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 2013No. A12-2078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal in this eviction matter, appellant-tenant argues that his eviction was invalid because it resulted from the imposition of late fees exceeding eight percent of appellant’s rent payment in violation of Minn.Stat. § 504B.177(a). Appellant also argues that the district court erred by determining that section 504B.177(a) conflicts with federal regulations and guidelines permitting landlords to impose “reasonable” late fees on public-housing tenants, and that state law was therefore preempted. Because Minn. Stat. § 504B.177(a) does not conflict with any federal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Hous. Auth. v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API