Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal in this eviction matter, appellant-tenant argues that his eviction was invalid because it resulted from the imposition of late fees exceeding eight percent of appellant’s rent payment in violation of Minn.Stat. § 504B.177(a). Appellant also argues that the district court erred by determining that section 504B.177(a) conflicts with federal regulations and guidelines permitting landlords to impose “reasonable” late fees on public-housing tenants, and that state law was therefore preempted. Because Minn. Stat. § 504B.177(a) does not conflict with any federal…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Hous. Auth. v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2025