Legal Opinion

Minn. Chamber Commerce v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 2019No. A18-0771Published

1Opinion of the CourtBjorkman, Judge

These related appeals concern a City of Minneapolis ordinance that requires employers to provide sick-and-safe leave. Respondents Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al. (the chamber) contend that state law conflicts with and impliedly preempts the ordinance. Appellant City of Minneapolis challenges the district court's ruling that application of the ordinance to employers located outside the city violates the extraterritoriality doctrine. We affirm the district court's determination that state law does not preempt the ordinance. But because we conclude that the ordinance does not have…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API