City of Burlingame v. White
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARTINELLI, J. pro tem.*
Petitioner, city of Burlingame, a municipal corporation and general law city, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, city clerk of the city of Burlingame, to cause bonds in the principal amount of $32,000 to be lithographed, printed or engraved as prescribed by resolution of the city council.
The facts are agreed. Ordinance Number 670 calling a special municipal election, pursuant to the Municipality Bond *178Act of 1901 (Gov. Code, §§43600-43638), required under section 43608 of the Government Code was duly passed. The relevant portions of that ordinance, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Fairfield v. HutcheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Cary v. BlodgettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.