Hellman v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover from the city of Los Angeles the sum of $479.60, with interest, on account of taxes paid by him to the city under protest, which taxes he claims were illegal and void. In September, 1900, the council of the city of Los Angeles passed an ordinance fixing the tax levy for municipal purposes for the year 1900-1901. This tax levy embraced the following items:—
Cents.
For general public school bonds (1899)...............06.40
For waterworks bonds (1899).......................00.60
For public school improvement bonds (1899).........02.36
Plaintiff was the owner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burch v. . NewburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kelsey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Phelan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Brill v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Ryan v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.