Legal Opinion

Corrigan Dispatch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 23, 1967No. C.D. 2899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Judge:

The consolidated protests in this case cover merchandise described as unfilled glass candle jars. In their imported condition, they consist of clear cone-shaped containers of approximately 9 inches in length with the middle portion bulging out to a diameter of from 3 to 4 inches, narrowing at the top to an opening of about 2 inches and tapering to a point at the bottom. They were assessed with duty as blown glass household articles at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802.1

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Kahlen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API