Legal Opinion

Pressner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1962No. 67019; protest 60/5537 (New York)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest is directed against merchandise that is described on the invoice as “Glass Fawn in Mirror Case” and which was assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51898, as glass articles of a kind or class provided for therein. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, which, so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  3. Corrigan Dispatch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Gloy's Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API