Legal Opinion

Kahlen v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 12, 1911No. 448PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 23721 (T. D. 30800).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The collector of - customs at the port of New York classified an importation of glazed paper as paper not specially provided for and *207assessed it for duty at 25 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 402 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, the material parts of -which paragraph read as follows:

402. Paper hangings and paper for screens or fireboards,. and all other paper not. specially provided for in this act, twenty-five per centum ad valorem; * * *.

The importer claimed that the merchandise was printing paper suitable for books and protested'that as such printing paper the…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Dalton Cooper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Hornung v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API