Klipstein v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers (T. D. 30667).
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
The appellants in this case imported at the port of New York certain merchandise which was invoiced as “oil of birch” and returned by the appraiser in a special report as “birch-tar oil distilled from the wood and used in the manufacture of russia leather.” The merchandise was assessed by the collector at 25 per cent ad valorem' under paragraph 3 of the tariff act of 1897, which paragraph reads as follows:
3. Alkalies, alkaloids, distilled oils, essential oils, expressed oils, rendered oils; and all combinations of the foregoing; and all chemical compounds and salts not specially provided for…
2Cited by58 opinions
- Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Greatrex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.