Legal Opinion

Avecia, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 19, 2006No. Consol. 05-00183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

Following a bench trial on whether imported ink-jet ink concentrates consisting of chromophores in deionized water should be classified for customs duty purposes under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) as “synthetic organic coloring material,” specifically “dyes,” of heading 3204, or “printing inks” of heading 3215, the Court concludes that the products are correctly classifiable under heading 3215.

Procedural Background

This proceeding resolves a lengthy dispute between the plaintiff Avecia, Inc. 1 and the defendant United States involving the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
  2. Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  3. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Netchem, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. United States v. Optrex Am., InUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API