Legal Opinion
Riekes Crisa Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided April 3, 1980No. C.D. 4852; Consolidated Court No. 65/19461PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for Customs duty purposes, of glass jars imported from Mexico. The glass jars are of three different styles known as the “Tiffany,” the “Monterrey” or “Hurricane,” and the “Parisian” or teardrop.
Ten of the fifteen consolidated protests include “Tiffany,” “Monterrey” or “Hurricane,” and “Parisian” or teardrop glass jars which were classified by the Customs officials under item 546.51 or 546.52 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) depending upon the date of entry, as other glassware…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Teleflora Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Bousa, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Kraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Lenox Collections v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.