Legal Opinion
Bucholz v. Hutton
District Court, D. Montana
Decided July 8, 1957No. Civ. A. 1899PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to set aside the service of summons and dismiss the action, on the ground that the defendant has not been properly served with process in the manner required by Sections 53-201 to 53-206, Revised Codes of Montana, 1947, providing for service on non-resident owners and operators of motor vehicles. In particular, defendant claims a failure to comply with the proviso in Section 53-204, which reads:
“Service of process, how made— fees. Service of such summons or process under sections 53-202 and 53-203 shall be made by leaving a copy thereof…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Cloyd v. CloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Andrew A. Kendall v. Overseas Development Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, James A. Gershman, David GarstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Muncie v. Westcraft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
- School Committee v. North Providence Federation of Teachers, Local 920Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.