Legal Opinion

Andrew A. Kendall v. Overseas Development Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, James A. Gershman, David Garst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1983No. 82-3125PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

The U.S. District Court dismissed Kendall’s suit as to defendant Garst for the reason that a state court had previously dismissed a similar action Kendall had brought against Garst on the grounds of lack of in personam jurisdiction. Kendall appeals contending that he had the right to relitigate the jurisdictional issue. Because the federal cause of action set forth no new facts which would alter the result reached by the state court, we affirm.

Kendall originally filed suit in the Idaho state court against Overseas Development Corp., James Gershman, David Garst, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Americana Fabrics, Inc. v. L & L Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Jonathan Bennet KaytsoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Meyers v. Asics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1989
  5. Ryan Cox v. Coinmarketcap Opco, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API