Legal Opinion
William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 40871PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
This antitrust action was instituted under sectiqns 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2. During the course of pre-trial discussions, the question arose as to whether this action may properly be maintained as a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. At the direction of the Court, the parties briefed and argued the issue on October 7, 1969. After considering the respective contentions of the parties, the Court concludes *38that this action is not properly maintainable as a class action. This determination, however, does not preclude the plaintiff from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robert M. Knuth, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative Association, Robert M. Knuth,appellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- Brooks v. BrileyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1967
- Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
- Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ingenito v. Bermec CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Cambanis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- City & County of Denver v. American Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.