Legal Opinion
Lucas v. Seagrave Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1967No. Civ. 4-66-420PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the several motions of defendant Seagrave. The plaintiffs are residents of Minnesota. Defendants Seagrave Corporation, Hupp Corporation and Great West Life Assurance Company are foreign corporations doing business in Minnesota. The motions are submitted upon affidavits and briefs of the parties and oral arguments.
The complaint alleges that the named plaintiffs and others similarly situated achieved the status of beneficiaries of a non-contributory employee annuity plan of the defendant Seagrave Corporation. The complaint further…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
- Daisy B. Stone v. Edley Craighill Nicholas Stone and Richard Fielding Stone, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Fidelis Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Michael Kolentus v. Avco Corporation and Avco Precision Products Division, Avco Corporation, and Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.