Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Briley

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 9, 1967No. Civ. 4747PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. MILLER, District Judge.

In this action we are requested to strike down and to enjoin the enforcement of numerous state criminal laws and municipal ordinances for alleged vagueness and overbreadth and for invalidity as applied to plaintiffs and others similarly situated. Giving rise to the litigation were the North Nashville riots which occurred on April 8, 9 and 10, 1967, an outbreak of violence and lawlessness which led to police intervention and subsequent arrests and criminal charges. *541For the reasons stated in this opinion we must emphatically reject the plaintiffs’ invitation…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Maryland Citizens for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  2. Jones v. State Board of Education of and for State of Tenn.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
  3. Koen v. LongDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969
  4. J. L. Leflore v. James RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API