Cambanis v. Nationwide Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from an order denying class certification. We conclude, inter alia, that the trial court erred in holding that precedent establishing liability is inconsistent with class status. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the case to proceed as a class action.
Facts and Procedural History
Appellant, Julia A. Cambanis, is the administratrix of the estate of Louis Cambanis, her deceased husband. The decedent was struck by a motor vehicle operated by an insured of Nationwide Insurance Company, appellee. As a result, Louis Cambanis died two days later. At the time of his…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Cook v. Highland Water & S. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Baldassari v. Suburban Cable TV Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Clark v. PFIZER INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.