Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Able
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1967No. 66 Civ. 3216, 3382, 3471, 3536, 3589, 3658, 3706, 3775, 3859, 3885, 3997, 4194, and 4363PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Memorandum Decision and Order on Motions to Transfer and Class Action
These are motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) seeking a transfer to the United States District Court, Central District of California, of 12 separate actions commenced in this District and one removed here from Supreme Court, State of New York, County of New York. 1 An identical motion to transfer was made by defendants in all 13 cases. The hearing on these motions was consolidated. Rule 42 (a), Fed.R.Civ.P.
These actions are brought pursuant to applicable provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Peyser v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Golconda Mining Corp. v. HerlandsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- De Luxe Game Corp. v. Wonder Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.