Legal Opinion

Hook v. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion for nonsuit, decision on which was reserved until after the verdict of the jury pursuant to section 1187 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, J.

This action is brought on a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant on the 30th day of September, 1902, for the sum of $1,000, on the life of William Hook, payable to his brother, the plaintiff herein. William Hook died April 17, 1903.

The policy contains the following provision: “ This policy is issued in consideration of the application therefor,, a copy of which is hereto attached and is made a part of this contract.” The application was signed by the insured September 23, 1902, and after certain questions therein propounded and the answers thereto contains the following statement:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Plumb v. . Cattaraugus Co. Mutual Insurance Company.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Sternaman v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Trenton Banking Company v. . DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Foot v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Satz v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Bollard v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Ruggirello v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Metzger v. Ætna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  5. Hubbard v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API