Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Ohio Farmers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The action is for damages under a fire insurance policy covering an automobile. The plaintiff has been nonsuited under the following state of facts. His assignor, while in possession of the automobile under a lease (the title resting in a finance corporation) applied for fire insurance to a person who concededly represented this defendant for that purpose. It is undisputed that the following conversation occurred: “ I [the plaintiff’s assignor] said I had an automobile I wanted to get insured. * * * She [defendant’s agent] said ' Is this car yours? ’ I said ‘ There is one payment back on it,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Forward v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bollard v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Hessler v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Bollard v. . New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Hook v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cardinal v. Mercury InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Valery v. Allied Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933