Metzger v. Ætna Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The action is to recover on a policy of fire insurance. The only question presented relates to whether the policy was valid and in effect at the time the fire occurred.
Many of the principal facts have been stated in the opinion in actions Nos. 1 and 2 between substantially the same parties, decided herewith (229 App. Div. 2). This case, however, stands upon a different footing and the additional facts may now be given.
The coverage was for $1,500 “ On stock of merchandise consisting principally of chemical supplies, napthalene and crude manufactured and in the process of manufacture — All…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Harper v. . the Albany Mutual Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Buckley v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of MissouriNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Salomon v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rhinebeck Bicycle Shop, Inc. v. Sterling InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Continental Cas. Co. v. RosenzweigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- LIVERPOOL & LONDON & GLOBE INSURANCE CO. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Metzger v. Ætna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.