Legal Opinion
Satz v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
.Pound, J.
The action is on a policy of burglary insurance. The policy provides:
-THE MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY,, hereinafter called the Company, in consideration of the payment of the premium and of the statements contained in the schedule hereof, which statements the assured makes on the acceptance of this policy and warrants to be true, hereby agrees to indemnity, in the amounts as defined in Item Twelve (12) of said schedule, the person or persons designated in Statement One (1) thereof.”
In the schedule which is attached to and forms part of the policy it is also expressly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Van Schoick v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Sternaman v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Wood v. . American Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Broidy v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. Of Worcester, Mass.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Abbott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Michigan Automobile Ins. v. Van BuskirkOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Hurley v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.