Legal Opinion

Ruggirello v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 37,834PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

After purchasing a used car, 1930 model, direct from the Cadillac Motor Car Company, plaintiff applied to a representative of defendant insurance company, on June 27, 1931, for a policy in the amount of $1,800, insuring the car against loss by theft, etc. The agent examined the car, and upon being informed by plaintiff that it had cost him only $1,800, stated that the company would not give him more than $1,400 of insurance.Plaintiff argued with the agent, told him that he had paid $1,800 in cash, and that if the car had been purchased on time the cost would have been from $2,300 to $2,500,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. AngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. North American Fire Insurance v. ThroopMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Layton v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Rives Plating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. VinceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchwarzerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Pitcher v. World Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API