Legal Opinion
United States v. Failla
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 29, 1954No. Civ. 256-50PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action under the Renegotiation Act as amended by the Acts of October 21, 1942, July 1, 1943 and July 14, 1943, 56 Stat. 982; 57 Stat. 347, and 57 Stat. 564, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191. The jurisdiction of the Court is derived from Section 403(c) (2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §, 1191(c)(2). The claim of the plaintiff is for “excessive profits” realized by Anthony Failla and Marian Failla, hereinafter identified as the Contractors, during the fiscal year 1943. These profits were determined and eliminated by agreement pursuant to the applicable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stow Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Scandia Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Howard B. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. SummDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968
- United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Concerned Citizens of Bushkill Township v. CostleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- H. A. Jackson, an Individual Formerly Doing Business as Jackson Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.