Legal Opinion

H. A. Jackson, an Individual Formerly Doing Business as Jackson Products v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1957No. 12685_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are here asked to determine whether in an action by the United States to recover excessive profits conceded to be due under the Renegotiation Act, 1 the defendant-appellant can litigate the correctness of the amount of tax credit allowed against such excessive profits. We are of the opinion that the defendant-appellant cannot do so and adopt the reasoning of the Court in United States v. Failla, D.C.N.J., 120 F.Supp. 797 and United States v. Failla, 3 Cir., 219 F.2d 212. The remedy available to defendant-appellant is to pay the amount of the admitted excessive profits, less the allowed tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. FaillaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API