H. A. Jackson, an Individual Formerly Doing Business as Jackson Products v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
We are here asked to determine whether in an action by the United States to recover excessive profits conceded to be due under the Renegotiation Act, 1 the defendant-appellant can litigate the correctness of the amount of tax credit allowed against such excessive profits. We are of the opinion that the defendant-appellant cannot do so and adopt the reasoning of the Court in United States v. Failla, D.C.N.J., 120 F.Supp. 797 and United States v. Failla, 3 Cir., 219 F.2d 212. The remedy available to defendant-appellant is to pay the amount of the admitted excessive profits, less the allowed tax…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- United States v. FaillaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swartzbaugh Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961