Legal Opinion

United States v. Moorman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1950No. 97PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The questions presented relate to the interpretation and validity of terms in a government construction contract providing that in contractual disputes the decisions of the Secretary of War or his authorized representative shall be final and binding.

The respondent partnership entered into a standard form contract with the United States to grade the site of a proposed aircraft assembly plant. Article 1 of the contract provided for payment of 24 cents per cubic yard of grading, satisfactorily completed “in strict accordance with the specifications, schedules, and drawings, all of which are made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Merrill-Ruckgaber Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API