Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1946No. 696 and 697PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The narrow question here is whether a contractor’s failure to exhaust the administrative appeal provisions of a government construction contract bars him from bringing suit in the Court of Claims to recover damages.

Respondent, a building contractor, entered into two contracts1 with the United States through the War Department in 1933 to construct officers’ quarters at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, which were being built as a Federal *236Emergency Administration of Public Works project. Disputes arose as to excavations for footings and as to increased wages ordered to be paid to respondent’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API