United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
The narrow question here is whether a contractor’s failure to exhaust the administrative appeal provisions of a government construction contract bars him from bringing suit in the Court of Claims to recover damages.
Respondent, a building contractor, entered into two contracts1 with the United States through the War Department in 1933 to construct officers’ quarters at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, which were being built as a Federal *236Emergency Administration of Public Works project. Disputes arose as to excavations for footings and as to increased wages ordered to be paid to respondent’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
3Cited by140 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.