Legal Opinion

United States v. Summ

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 3, 1968No. Civ. A. 918-67PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOLAHAN, District Judge:

The present action raises the difficult question of whether the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, which permits contract-based suits against the federal government for less than $10,000, 1 also permits counterclaims against the Government which seek recovery of not more than $10,000 in excess of the judgment sought by the Government, in contravention of the common law rule — based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity — that counterclaims against the Government may only be asserted for the limited purposes of defeating or diminishing the recovery sought by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Nipissing Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972
  2. United States v. Gregory Park, Section II, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
  3. United States v. Articles of Food Clover Club Potato ChipsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
  4. United States v. Timber Access Industries Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1971
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Delta Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API