United States v. Summ
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
The present action raises the difficult question of whether the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, which permits contract-based suits against the federal government for less than $10,000, 1 also permits counterclaims against the Government which seek recovery of not more than $10,000 in excess of the judgment sought by the Government, in contravention of the common law rule — based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity — that counterclaims against the Government may only be asserted for the limited purposes of defeating or diminishing the recovery sought by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Nipissing Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972
- United States v. Gregory Park, Section II, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- United States v. Articles of Food Clover Club Potato ChipsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
- United States v. Timber Access Industries Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1971
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Delta Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.