Legal Opinion

United States v. Failla

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 21, 1955No. 11395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The question presented on this appeal is whether, in an action brought by the United States in the district court for the refund of excessive profits made on a government contract, the district court has jurisdiction to consider a defense that the tax credit allowed by the Government by reason of the return of the excessive profits has been incorrectly computed and should be larger in amount. The question arises from the following facts:

Anthony Failla1 and Marian Failla, whom we shall call the Contractors, were partners doing business as the New Jersey Gear and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Campbell (United States, Intervenor) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Stow Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. United States v. FaillaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
  4. Vokal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
  2. Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. H. A. Jackson, an Individual Formerly Doing Business as Jackson Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
  5. United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API