Legal Opinion
Graham v. Rosemount, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1999No. Civ. 97-1528 (DSD/JGL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court grants defendants’ motions.
BACKGROUND
In 1987, plaintiff Claryce Graham began working as a graphics coordinator for defendant Rosemount, Inc. at its facility in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. In Minnesota, Rosemount manufactures temperature, pressure, and flow measurement instruments for use in industrial markets. Graham’s job at Rosemount was to assist in the production of written materials such as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auto-Chlor System of Minnesota, Inc. v. JohnsonDiverseyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- Ciszewski v. Engineered Polymers Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- City of Huntington Beach v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Koscielski v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Andre Duke v. Doug Collins, Secretary of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.