Legal Opinion
Ciszewski v. Engineered Polymers Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2001No. Civ. 99-1666 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sally Ciszewski (“Ciszewski”), Judy Lucking (“Lucking”), Laura Carlson (“Carlson”), Kathryn Niesen (“Niesen”) and Faye Kopp (“Kopp”) bring this action against defendant alleging claims of disability discrimination, workers compensation retaliation and gender discrimination. The defendant has moved for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants defendant’s motions on plaintiffs’ disability discrimination, retaliatory discharge and disparate treatment gender discrimination claims. The Court also…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kelly Renee Neumann v. At & T Communications, Inc., Kelly Renee Neumann v. At & T Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Gates McDonald Co., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Escobar v. Swift and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Wolski v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.