Legal Opinion

City of Huntington Beach v. Public Utilities Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 2013No. G044796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Public Utilities Code section 79011 grants “telephone corporations” the privilege to construct infrastructure upon public rights-of-way, subject to a municipality’s “right to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place, and manner in which roads, highways, and waterways are accessed” (§ 7901.1, subd. (a)). In the proceeding under review, the Public Utilities Commission (commission or PUC) classified NextG2 as a telephone corporation and approved NextG’s proposed construction project in the City of Huntington Beach (the City).

The City is opposed to aspects of NextG’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. PeeveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of S.F.California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. T-Mobile West LLC v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. $2,709 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Bullseye Telecom, Inc. v. Cal. P.U.C.California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API