Legal Opinion
Koscielski v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 26, 2005No. Civ.03-4902(RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Mark Koscielski and Barbara Bergstrom operate Koscielski’s Guns and Ammo (“Plaintiffs”), a Minneapolis firearms dealership. They have sued the City of Minneapolis (“the City”) over a zoning ordinance that restricts where firearms dealerships may operate within Minneapolis. The City has moved for summary judgment on each of Plaintiffs’ claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the City’s Motion.
Background
The City has adopted a zoning ordinance that restricts where a “Firearms dealer” can operate (“the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caswell v. City of BloomingtonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006