Legal Opinion
Auto-Chlor System of Minnesota, Inc. v. JohnsonDiversey
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 19, 2004No. Civ. 02-535(RHK/SRN)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs are eight commercial dish-washing dealers who signed Dealer Contracts with the Auto-Chlor System in the 1970s and 1980s. Defendant Auto-C, LLC, (“Auto-C”), a subsidiary of Defendant JohnsonDiversey, Inc. (“JohnsonDi-versey”), now owns the Auto-Chlor System, while Defendant DiverseyLever, Inc. (“DiverseyLever”), now known as DLever, owned the Auto-Chlor System from March 1999 until May 2002. Generally, the Dealer Contracts provide Plaintiffs with exclusive territories in which to use the Auto-Chlor System’s trademarks and…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Ellis Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Skyland Metropolitan District v. Mountain West Enterprise, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Mahaska Bottling Co. v. PepsiCo Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017
- Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.