Legal Opinion

Van Gilder v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1936PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 28, 1936 :

Rosenberry, C. J.

It is the contention of the plaintiff that the ordinance adopted January 4, 1933, was invalid be*63cause the council had before it no “recommendation” of the board of police and fire commissioners. This contention is based largely upon the proposition that in the communication made on behalf of the board by its president to the mayor the word “suggested” was used instead of “recommended.” Without attempting to draw any fine distinction between the dictionary definitions of these words, it is apparent that the statement made by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Glendale Professional Policemen's Ass'n v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API