Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate Club

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1945No. 4792PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

For the fiscal year 1943-44, the City of Tucson, operating under a home rule charter, included and adopted in its annual budget an item of $17,500 for advertising purposes. From the previous annual budget it had on hand unexpended $3,792.08, leaving the net amount to be raised by taxation $13,707.92, of which $13,670.42 was collected during the year. On account of back taxes for prior years levied for advertising purposes, there was also collected during the fiscal year 1943-44 the sum of $710.92. The unexpended balance and the amount collected as back taxes were unencumbered,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Peterson v. SundtArizona Supreme Court · 1948

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API