City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate Club
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Judge.
For the fiscal year 1943-44, the City of Tucson, operating under a home rule charter, included and adopted in its annual budget an item of $17,500 for advertising purposes. From the previous annual budget it had on hand unexpended $3,792.08, leaving the net amount to be raised by taxation $13,707.92, of which $13,670.42 was collected during the year. On account of back taxes for prior years levied for advertising purposes, there was also collected during the fiscal year 1943-44 the sum of $710.92. The unexpended balance and the amount collected as back taxes were unencumbered,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Peterson v. SundtArizona Supreme Court · 1948
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.