Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Chief Justice.
These two cases, consolidated for our review, raise the issue of the constitutionality of the Arizona deannexation law, former version A.R.S. § 9-471 (Laws 1986 Ch. 45, § 4, as amended by Laws 1986 Ch. 414, § 1). The municipalities involved in both cases claim the statute is unconstitutional as a prohibited special or local law under Ariz. Const, art. 4, pt. 2, § 19(20), which provides:
No local or special laws shall be enacted in any of the following cases, that is to say:
$ * * * $ $
20. When a general law can be made applicable.
The two divisions of the court of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Illinois Polygraph Society v. PellicanoIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Dream Palace v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.