Legal Opinion

Vestner v. Northern Cal. Power Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1910No. Sac. No. 1719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries. The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone. Plaintiff was employed by the defendant corporation as a lineman and was engaged with other workmen constructing a power line from Orland to Hamilton in Glenn County. The complaint alleged that plaintiff was directed by defendant to ascend a tree for the purpose of placing certain wires therein; that he climbed the tree as directed and while there was caught and injured by the falling of another tree which defendant negligently and carelessly cut…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Daves v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McLean v. Blue Point Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Trimble v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bresette v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Young v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Barckdall v. Simons Brick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Ellinwood v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API