Legal Opinion
Trimble v. New York Life Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1898No. 3114PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Beetsoet, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff upon a life insurance policy issued by the Hew York Life Insurance Company upon the life of one Edward H. Fleming, who was the former husband of Sallie F. Red-ding, deceased. The policy is for the sum of $5,000. It is not necessary to repeat the complaint, as it is the usual complaint in such cases, showing the facts necessary to recover, if the allegations be true. The answer denies the liability, avers the giving of the notice required in due form, and the lapse of the policy for non-payment of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Frece v. National Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Phelan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hicks v. National Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
- Rowe v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- McMaster v. New York Life Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flint v. Provident Life & Trust Co. of PhiladelphiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Vestner v. Northern Cal. Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Summit v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904