Legal Opinion

Barckdall v. Simons Brick Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1913No. Civ. No. 1270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff on account of defendant’s negligence. Judgment was entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff, from which, and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, it appeals.

At the time of the injury to plaintiff he was an employee of defendant engaged in the operation of a hand press used in the manufacture of brick. This press in its construction resembled an ordinary letter press. The table or under side of the press contained a mould wherein the operator with a scoop or shovel placed the material used…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKee v. TourtellotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Stewart v. Pittsburg & Montana Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Vestner v. Northern Cal. Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Bickford v. MauserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Bickford v. MauserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API