Legal Opinion

Young v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1914No. Civ. No. 1270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of . three thousand dollars, damages claimed to have been suffered by the plaintiff through the death of her son, a minor of the age of eighteen years, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The following are the facts of the case: The defendant is a corporation, and was at the time of the accident which caused the death of the youth, engaged in the lumber business, owning a sawmill and conducting logging operations at or in the vicinity of a place known as Damon Mill, in the county of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Peters v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Borland v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lissak v. Crocker Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Beasley v. San José Fruit-Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lix v. GastianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Bayer v. SuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Bayer v. SuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API