Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. William P. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages for injuries sustained by him while in its employ by reason of its negligence. He recovered judgment, and this appeal is taken from the order of the court denying defendant a new trial.
Plaintiff showed that the defendant had entered into a written contract with the Olympic Salt Water Company, a corporation, to construct a pier on the beach near the Cliff House, in the city and county of San Francisco. The work of construction was commenced by the defendant under the contract. M. B. Stone was the superintendent of the defendant company and in charge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Cullen v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Loughlin v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.