Legal Opinion
Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 2010No. A125618PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
On April 6, 2005, Chevron Products Company (Chevron) submitted an application to the City of Richmond (City) for the necessary permits to proceed with construction of the Chevron Energy and Hydrogen Renewal Project (the Project). The Project was designed to replace and upgrade certain manufacturing facilities at the Chevron Richmond Refinery (the Refinery), with the objective of improving the Refinery’s ability to process a more varied mix of crude oil types from a wider variety of sources than it currently processes. Approximately three years later, on July…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Preserve Wild Santee v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.